Baby Milk Action Year Report: October 2003 - September 2004
The monitoring shows how companies increasingly idealise their products with health and nutrition claims, especially for optional ingredients such as Long Chain fatty acids (LCPs), and Pre- and Pro-biotics. Nestlés is using hypo-allergenic claims to promote its formula to health workers in the UK despite legal action in the United States which ruled the name as misleading. This followed several cases of anaphylactic shock in allergic infants fed the milk. The issue of health claims, along with continued concerns about contamination of powdered infant formula by pathogens, were central to discussions at Codex Alimentarius, the EU Commission and the World Health Assembly. Thirteen years after the adoption of the EU Directive on infant formula, the European Commission issued very weak proposals for a redrafted Directive which allow several new claims. The EU Commission position, which so favours industry, undermines the efforts of many countries inside and outside the EU to protect breastfeeding. The tough draft WHA Resolution, proposed by 6 countries in May was delayed by a year, following pressure by the USA, Canada, Germany, Japan and Australia and Russia. Palau, a sponsor of the Resolution cautioned: Justice delayed is justice denied.
Meanwhile, concern continues to grow over Enterbacter Sakazakii contamination of powdered infant formula. Baby Milk Action and our IBFAN partners are calling for levels of contamination to be reduced and for clear warnings on labels and better preparation instructions. The baby food industry, anxious to protect the idealised image of their products, opposes the moves.
The UK Department of Health press release during National Breastfeeding Week entitled: Myths stop women giving babies the best start in life, reported that: Over a third (34%) of women believe that modern infant formula milks are very similar or the same as breastmilk. The monitoring report we produced on behalf of the Baby Feeding Law Group demonstrates how companies have promoted this myth. The report is being distributed widely as part of our campaign to strengthen UK law and to empower people to report and stop malpractice (download pdf).
Members and supporters were essential in raising awareness of the many issues that we tackle. The Boycott of Nestlé, the company responsible for more aggressive baby food promotion than any other, continued to bring public attention to the global concerns. Nestlé lost debates with Baby Milk Action at Nottingham, Reading and Sheffield Universities (Nottingham debate report).
Area contacts and staff held stalls and workshops at festivals and health professional, trade union and political conferences. The London Group organized the annual demonstration at Nestlé (UK) HQ in May. The Reading and Berkshire group organised our stall at the WOMAD festival in July. We joined Out of the Blue trust for the annual corporate-free Tap Water Awards and a demonstration at Nestlés Perrier Comedy Award at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival in August.
Demonstrations were held at several training days on infant nutrition organised by SMA to highlight the companys criminal conviction for illegal formula advertising in the UK and marketing malpractice worldwide.
Conferences organised by the Association of Breastfeeding Mothers, Scottish NHS Boards and Centre for International Child Health included presentations on the marketing requirements by Baby Milk Action.
We were invited to speak at a conference organised by leading environment and human rights NGOs in Nestlés home city of Vevey, Switzerland in June. The Conference exposed Nestlé malpractice and endorsed a letter calling for Nestlé to be excluded from the United Nations Global Compact (see Update 35).
IBFAN (the International Baby Food Action Network) celebrated its 25th Anniversary in 2004. We are the UK member of this network, which was formed by 6 groups. There are now more than 200 groups in over 100 countries.
In December we gave a presentation
at the Asia Pacific Conference, organised by the IBFAN group, the Breastfeeding
Promotion Network of India. Key
Policy makers joined over 500 participants from 38 countries and from
nearly every state of India. We also attended the Regional Colloquium
on HIV and infant feeding.
Within IBFAN we have responsibility for company campaigns and share responsibility for Code Advocacy in Europe. We maintain the multi-lingual IBFAN website.
We continued to produce the Campaign for Ethical Marketing action sheets, targeting the violations of all companies, and assisting supporters to write letters.
We coordinated the launch of IBFANs global monitoring report, Breaking the Rules, Stretching the Rules 2004, at the House of Commons in May, linked to an Early Day Motion tabled by Lynne Jones MP calling for action to end malpractice, which gained wide support. We were joined by IBFAN experts from around the world. A film of the launch is available on DVD and video.
As part of UK monitoring facilitated by the Kings Fund, we produced a Look What Theyre Doing in the UK monitoring report (download pdf). With the help of the National Childbirth Trust, over 15,000 copies have been distributed.
We joined our IBFAN partners at the WHO Executive Board meeting in January and the World Health Assembly in May where a strong draft Resolution calling for no health claims on infant foods, controls on the sponsorship of health workers and warnings on powdered infant formula labels about contamination, was tabled by 6 small countries. Despite the strong support for the Resolution, a few countries successfully called for the matter to be delayed until 2005. We also worked on WHOs Global Strategy on Diet and Physical Activity which was eventually passed. Although fierce lobbying by the sugar industry substantially weakened the text, our advocacy helped to ensure breastfeeding was included. Before the WHO meetings we organised briefing sessions with health and development NGOs and the UK Government.
In March we organised a training day on the Code for.policy makers from the UK Food Standards Agency and the Departments of Health and International Development. In April, the European Commission issued a proposal for a revision of the European Directive on infant formula. Together with IBFAN Luxembourg we coordinated the lobby to bring the Directive in line with the International Code and WHA Resolutions.
At WHO Europes 4th Ministerial Conference on Environment and Health in Budapest in June, together with IBFAN Luxembourg, we succeeded in getting measures to protect breastfeeding included in the Childrens Action Plan for Europe (CEHAPE). With environmental NGOs we monitored media reports on contamination and breastfeeding. Following our intervention, WHO changed the page on pollution in its new atlas, Inheriting the World, to stress breastfeeding is still best for infants.
We attended Codex Alimentarious Commission meetings in Germany in November and in Canada in May. A qualified ban on health and nutrition claims on foods for infants and young children was finally adopted in July.
We continued as the Secretariat of the Baby Feeding Law Group (UK) which has 16 member organisations, including the Royal College of Midwives, the Health Visitors Association and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health The group campaigns to strengthen UK legislation in line with the International Code and Resolutions.
As the Coordinator of the International Nestlé Boycott, we attended the Nestlé AGM in Switzerland in April, calling on Nestlé to put warnings on the labels of its infant formula.
We are members of NGO networks such as Sustain, the UK Consortium on AIDS and the UK Food Group and work with trade unions such as UNISON.
Visitors to the Baby Milk Action website access over 43,000 pages every month, many downloading leaflets, posters and briefing papers for their campaigning work. A broadcasts section contains film clips, such as the WOMAD theatre piece.
Baby Milk Action's work this year has been funded by grants from The Dorfred Charitable Trust, The Eleanor Rathbone Charitable Trust, The Funding Network, The Gibbs Charitable Trust, GIFA, International Code Documentation Centre, The Kings Fund, The Methodist Relief & Development Fund, The Network for Social Change, OXFAM, The Polden-Puckham Charitable Foundation, Save the Children, SCIAF, UNISON, the United Reformed Church, WEMOS and World Vision.
We made a small surplus, in contrast to the previous years deficit, mainly through cutting back on staff hours.
Net Profit = £3,725
Charts are based on draft
Council of Directors
Gary Woolley, Chair
Patti Rundall (Policy Director)
Phyll Buchanan, Andy Chetley, Prof. G.J. Ebrahim, Chloe Fisher, Peter Greaves, Prof. Raymond Hodgson, Sheila Kitzinger, Dr Tim Lobstein, Prof. David Morley, Gabrielle Palmer, Dr. Peter Poore, Dr. Andrew Porter, Mary Renfrew, Magda Sachs, Dr. Penny Stanway, Dr. Tony Waterston, Kevin Watkins, Dr. A.F. Williams, Dr Pam Zinkin.
Sonia de Oliveira Brady,
Elaine Heath, Louise Krykunivsky, Tessa Martyn, Sang Hee Min, Lisa Woodburn.
The following served as area contacts during the year:
Aileen Banks, Hannah Bird, Barbara Bovington, Anne Bramley, Marianne Cowpe, Belinda Cox, Dh. Dharmavandana, Jonathan Dorsett, Anne Dowden, Maria Dowden, Silke Ebling, Maggie Ellis, Barbara Gleave, Patricia Hamilton, Joanna Hindley, Sarah Hughes & Andrew Finney, Jenifer Inman, Vicky Islam, Liz Lawrence, Steven Lee, Brenda Lewsey Cocks, Caroline Hind, Sue Malpass, Ellen Mateer, Jan Millar, Annette Ogilvie-Forbes, Mary Paterson, Jan Price, Jane Putsey, Jacqueline Quick, Catherine Reading, Carl Richards, Jenny Richardson, Magda Sachs, Sarah Saunby, Harriet Smith, Jane Tapp, Frankie Taylor, Mary Tones, Bernadette Walker, Katy Waters, Tracey Wells, Janette Westman, Patricia Wise, Catherine Woodhouse.
Particular thanks go to Area Contacts who stood down during 2003 - 2004 for their contribution to the campaign over the years.