Nestlé proposed
sponsorship of Lichfield District Council comes under scrutiny
10th January 2001
Nestlé marketing of
baby foods is coming under scrutiny once more after it entered
into discussions with Lichfield District Council over a possible
sponsorship deal for a theatre scheme. The Council is seeking
£1 million. A similar deal collapsed in Stockton last year after
Nestlé refused to attend a meeting where the issue was to be addressed
through what the Council called "the formal democratic process
of hearing both sides of the argument."
Councillor Martin Machray
has called for Lichfield District Council to hold a special meeting
with Nestlé and Baby Milk Action. According to the Express
and Star newspaper (2nd January) Council leader, David Smith,
said that he would be happy for Nestlé representatives to talk
to councillors. Baby Milk Action has not been contacted and called
the Council after receiving a copy of the newspaper report today.
A spokesperson informed us that Baby Milk Action is not being
invited to make a presentation at this stage. The spokesperson
would not say whether Nestlé has already been invited to make
a presentation.
When Stockton-on-Tees
Borough Council attempted to hold a special meeting on a similar
issue last year, Nestlé refused to attend after Baby Milk
Action accepted the offer to present its case (see press release
1st September 2000). The proposed
sponsorship deal in Stockton collapsed and the Council there is
now putting fundraising guidelines in place. Nestlé also
refused to attend a Public Hearing
on the baby food industry at the European Parliament on 22nd November
2000.
According to UNICEF,
reversing the decline in breastfeeding could save the lives of
1.5 million infants around the world every year. Where water is
unsafe, an artificially-fed child is up to 25 times more likely
to die as a result of diarrhoea than a breastfed child. Nestlé
is the target of an international boycott because monitoring by
citizens' groups around the world finds it to be responsible for
more violations of the marketing
standards adopted by the World Health Assembly than any other
company.
Dr. Charles Sagoe-Moses,
Chair of the Ghanaian Infant
Nutrition Action Network, said of the boycott campaign in
the UK: "The people there are campaigning because they
think they have a voice and they can use their voice to help some
people in the developing world who do not have a voice."
Nestlé was advised
to go on a "cause-related marketing" offensive by Saatchi
and Saatchi in 1999 after the Advertising Standards Authority
upheld all of Baby Milk Action's complaints about a Nestlé
anti-boycott advertisement. Nestlé had claimed in the advertisement
to market infant formula "ethically and responsibly"
(see press release 12th May 1999).
NCH (formerly National Children's Homes) is one of the organisations
which turned down Nestlé money at that time.
|